Friday, May 26, 2023

CHARLIE CHAN, BEATNIKS & SAMOANS

04 February 2018


ANTHROPOLOGY 281/1005--Week Three Assignment--CHARLIE CHAN, BEATNIKS & SAMOANS  

ANTH 281-1005

Dr. J Ferguson
University of Nevada, Reno
Spring 2018

Politeness--Involvement/Restraint
 
    Heard all too often today is the expression “Thank you so much”, and in many cases the fine line of ambiguity between polite and sarcastic (restrained)  is often blurred. Suffice it to say that the expression may not have originated in the English language at all and can be attributed cross-culturally to Sidney Toler’s role as “Charlie Chan” in his many portrayals as the Chinese detective in the late 30’s and early 40’s



  
     Three Different Contextual Representations of the Same Thing:
 
    Although the following doesn’t necessarily represent a plea, apology or excuse, it is nonetheless and example of a bona-fide contextual interpretation of a given expression:

   Whether it was Kerouac, Kaufman, Ginsburg or Caen who came up with the phrase,  “The Beat Generation” (and its  derivative “beatnik”)  meant many things to different people. To Post-Korean War veterans, the term meant “beaten”, weary, over-it-all. The jazz musicians of the 50’s era indirectly considered it a reference to their particular unique style of music. Still others considered it an envied lifestyle, replete with its own brand of dress, poetry, culture and language.



     
 
Samoan vs. American Greetings Comparisons:
 
     It is clear there is a more formal hierarchy of greetings in Samoan culture as exemplified by the lack of consideration for children in the community. What wasn’t made clear in the Duranti article was another of his works, “Linguistic Anthropology, A Reader” (Blackwell Publishing, 2009). Here, Duranti editorializes the Benjamin Bailey article on “interethnic” communication in a Culver City Korean store. The encounters were between the Korean store owner, other Koreans and African-Americans and referred to the above involvement-restraint politeness service encounters between them. In the Samoan observations, the encounters were not cross-cultural and therefore lacked a genuine base of comparison except within the circle of the community.

IOWA CAUCUS 2020

 


IMMEDIATE RELEASE//ATTN CD@TACNET//VIAJXC//AMBUSHPATROL//UNCLASSIFIED

IOWACAUCUS--Bernie Sanders & Vietnam----
BAD BLOOD WITH DES MOINES REGISTER
26 January 2020

"...The Des Moines Register's problem with Bernie is a problem with his deterrent strategy..." 

     (The Den @ UNR)--In late December of 1971, just weeks before the US Senate special election in Vermont, Sanders composed a message to the 16 Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) who occupied the Statue of Liberty;
      " Young men of this country have shed enough blood for the corporation heads and the politicians. Bring the troops home now. Let's return to the ideals symbolized by the Statue of Liberty." (Rutland Daily Herald)
    At the time, Sanders was a candidate for the Liberty Union Party, left wing, socialist, anti-war. The VVAW occupation lasted two days.

     Much fuss has been raised about candidate for President, Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and his historical "anti-war" posture. Yesterday's endorsement of  Senator Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA) for President by the Des Moines Register didn't just happen overnight. Note the actual "Reservation(s)" filed by the editorial board over Bernie's anything but hawkish sentiment for armed conflict;
     "His rhetoric is so anti-interventionist that one wonders whether he would recognize times when military action is justified as a deterrent." (Deterrent, DM Register)
     This isn't the first time Bernie's patriotism has been brought into question by the DM Register. In August, 2015, Steve Wikert published an opinion piece in the Iowa newspaper questioning Bernie's ability to be CINC if he registered as a conscientious objector during Viet Nam;
     "...he refused to do military service because he was a conscientious objector. He did so to avoid having to serve his country in the Vietnam War. Soon after he turned 26, too old to be drafted, and no longer needed ways to avoid the draft." (Wikert, DM Register)
     Wikert draws an inference that being a conscientious objector is just an excuse to get out of being drafted, including a formal definition in his article. When asked way back in 1971 about his decision to not go to the war, Bernie, while a member of the Liberty Union Party, had a completely different response to Greg Gum. It was during his campaign for US Senate and published in the Bennington Banner;
   
     "Obviously you haven't been listening to me. Do you know what the movement is? Have you read the books? Are you against the war in Vietnam?"
     "But what do you think?" was the reply from myself. "You're an individual, not a movement."
     "You don't understand. It's the movement that's important. Are you for it? If you're not, I don't want your vote." (Bennington Banner)
     Bernie never really came out and stated he was anti-war, a conscientious objector or a draft dodger in the interview, deflecting the question to emphasis on the "movement."  In the January, 1972 special election, he placed third with 2% of the vote. (Wikipedia)

     In yet another view during his campaign for US Senate in '71, Sanders again makes no mention of his individual status but refers to an idealistic proposal on Vietnam;
   
"Q. Do you favor President Nixon's wind-down of U.S participation in the Vietnam war? What different action would you favor taking, if any, and how would you do it?

A.  My position on Vietnam is to bring the troops home tomorrow, to institute a commission of national inquiry to find out who the people were who got us into the war, and why. The Vietnam war decision was made by less than 2,000 people, the average man or student had noting to say about it."
(Vietnam, Burlington Free Press)
     Again, there is no apparent reference to his personal status, just his political viewpoint, which is rather naïve and by military standards, not practical. It also might be noted that there doesn't appear to be any reference to Sanders before 1971 in archived newspapers with respect to Vietnam or his personal status.
     Sanders challenged his opponent in the special election, Robert Stafford, a Republican, to use his influence on the renewed bombing of the North;

     "If Robert Stafford is opposed to this war, he should use his influence in the Republican party to having the bombing halted immediately.: (Bombing, Bennington Banner)
     Again, the idealistic, unrealistic Sanders voiced an opinion that showed little or no understanding of military strategy at all; also with no reference to his personal feelings as a conscientious objector. The pattern is repetitive whereby the candidate deflected his status, involvement as a would-be soldier, to issues concerning defense that have little practical input. How would the Pentagon go about an "immediate" halt to the bombing; what about leverage at the Paris Peace talks? The naivete, genuine or otherwise, might be acceptable for a stoned Haight-Ashbury hippie but certainly not from a candidate for US Senate during the extremely polarized Vietnam Era politics. In fact, all the candidates for the special election opposed the bombing, including Stafford. (Candidates, Battleboro Reformer)



     Stafford polled 45K plus votes, Major close to 24K and Bernie at third in just under 1600 votes. "Less than thirty percent of the registered voters cast ballots."  (The Lowell Sun)
     The Des Moines Register's problem with Bernie is a problem with his deterrent strategy, which by definition can be found anywhere across the internet to be as nebulous as conventional strategy. For the DM Register, like Bernie deflecting his early career responses on his war objection status, to issue a blanket statement on it as a reason for non-endorsement, does not qualify it as an editorial opinion and should not be considered as a reason to vote for the opponent.

Further Reading

Des Moines Register Cancels Release of Final Iowa Poll

DES MOINES, Iowa -- The results of the highly anticipated Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll will not be released as expected Saturday night. According to a statement by Des Moines Register Executive Editor Carol Hunter, "A respondent raised an issue with the way the survey was administered, which could have compromised the results of the poll."

Sources
VVAW & Statue of Liberty, Rutland Daily Journal, 28 Dec, 1971, Page 16  (newspapers.com)
Deterrent, DM Register,
VVAW logo, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_Veterans_Against_the_War#/media/File:VVAW-logo.jpg
Endorsements, https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/caucus/2020/01/26/assessments-other-democrats-president-register-editorial-board-endorsement/4562162002/
Wikert, DM Register, https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/caucus/2015/08/26/sanders-commander-chief-vietnam-war-veteran/32404645/
Bennington Banner,  Saturday, 11 Dec 1971, Page 4. (newspapers.com)
1972 Special Election, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Union_Party#cite_note-9
Vietnam, Burlington Free Press, 24 Nov 1971, Page 7 (newspapers.com)
Bombing, Bennington Banner, Wednesday, 29 Dec 1979, Page 16 (newspapers.com)
Bombing, Battleboro Reformer, 30 Dec 1971, Page 1 (newspapers.com)
Votes, The Lowell (MA) Sun, 08 Jan 1972, Page 8, (newspapers.com)

IMMEDIATE RELEASE///@CD/TACNET VIA JC//AMBUSH//EOC//UNCLASSIFIED


IOWACAUCUS---The Des Moines Register Endorsement---

AFTERBATH & SHELL SHOCK

26 January 2020

This Just In--

#IOWACAUCUS--Bernie Sanders & Vietnam----BAD BLOOD WITH DES MOINES REGISTER

IMMEDIATE RELEASE//ATTN CD@TACNET//VIAJXC//AMBUSHPATROL//UNCLASSIFIED "...The Des Moines Register's problem with Bernie is a problem with his deterrent strategy..." (The Den @ UNR)--In late December of 1971, just weeks before the US Senate special election in Vermont, Sanders composed a message to the 16 Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) who occupied the Statue of Liberty; " Young men of this country have shed enough blood for the corporation heads and the politicians.

"...now an entirely different story about shell-shocked WIAs is hitting the wire..."    

      (The Den @ UNR)--The results are in, the news is out, and the editorial board has decided, here are the highlights of who didn't get the call--

     Joe Biden lacks "specific expertise" on income inequality issues and doesn't have a bold enough vision.  Mayor Buttigieg doesn't have enough experience having headed a city the "size of Davenport," the Davenport people must love that one. Amy Klobuchar stereotyped as "Midwest" pragmatist.  Steyer  is just "another billionaire businessman with no prior experience" while Yang has no experience at all. The board mentions Harris and Booker as dropouts but doesn't mention Bloomberg, he may not be running in Iowa. It could at least have given him a sentence as to being another one of those bored billionaires with nothing to do but buy the government. What about Bernie, the poll favorite?
     He failed to impress the board over at least two issues, his party-jumping out of convenience (in order to stay in the running) and military intervention. Declaring himself a Democrat after having been an Independent for so long seemed out of character and certainly out of favor. But the other one is an issue and one that no one, not even the Des Moines Register editorial board can foresee, how to stay out of foreign entanglements. It might be noted that Warren switched parties in 1996 (Wikipedia)

Endorsement: What intrigued us and what gave us pause about the other Democrats

CLOSE Because of the many well-qualified candidates, the editorial board is sharing its thoughts about other candidates in the hope that it might prove useful as Iowans weigh their choices. Editor's note: Register endorsement editorials generally focus on the candidates the editorial board endorses, rather than those it does not.


     How does the endorsement favor Warren? Having it  released before the caucus will undoubtedly give her a boost as only recently, she's tanked in the polls. None of that was brought to light and the why needs to be addressed, not just because another candidate rose. How does the non-endorsement favor Bernie, currently the leader in the most recent Iowa DM Register poll? If anything, his stand on keeping the troops out of quagmires might well play in his favor, by mere mention that "military action is justified as a deterrent" is certainly bordering on a hawkish stance for the Register. There is little proof that engaging in deterrent strategy will prevent war and it may well become a major issue in light of recent bungling in the Middle East.
      Note for instance not just the tragic shooting down of the Ukrainian airliner over Tehran, but now we are discovering that there were indeed serious injuries in the retaliatory missile attack on US bases in Iraq;

US says 34 troops suffered traumatic brain injury in Iran strikes on Iraqi base

The Pentagon disclosed Friday that 34 US service members had been diagnosed with traumatic brain injury following Iran's missile strikes on an Iraqi base earlier this month, a number higher than the military had previously announced. The revelation belies US President Donald Trump's initial claim that no Americans were harmed in the attack.


     Initial bragging out of the White House was the troops at the base had plenty of time to hit the bunkers and now an entirely different story about shell-shocked WIAs is hitting the wire. Senator Warren, it is also noted, was a co-sponsor of the bill to halt adventurism in the Middle East, the Prevention of Unconstitutional War with Iran Act of 2019, (S-1039) .

     It was initially created by Tom Udall (D-NM) and had 29 others sign on. Bernie was in early on March 4, 2019. Senator Warren didn't sign on until May 05, after at least half of the other co-sponsors had already given the OK. (S-1039, congress.gov)  Does this give a lean to the "hawkish" slant referred to in the deterrent strategy nuance of the editorial board? Possibly. In other words, Senator Warren had to be nudged into the non-intervention bill even as Sanders came in fifth behind Paul, Durbin, Leahy and Feinstein, all seasoned vets who had been "there" before.
     Whether the DM Register endorsement will have any effect on those who have already made up their mind, only Punxsutawney Phil knows; but one thing is for certain, you give up first place it's hard to get it back, even with newspaper cheerleaders.

Further Reading

Veterans of Foreign Wars demands apology from Trump for downplaying brain injuries from Iranian attack

CNN 6 hrs ago By Veronica Stracqualursi, CNN The Veterans of Foreign Wars is demanding that President Donald Trump apologize for downplaying traumatic brain injuries sustained by US service members in Iraq after Iranian missile strikes on American troops earlier this month.

More than 1,000 anti-war demonstrators march in downtown San Francisco

A crowd of more than 1,000 people gathered in front of tourists on cable cars at Market and Powell streets Saturday for an anti-war march and march to Union Square.

Sources

DM Register,  https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/caucus/2020/01/26/assessments-other-democrats-president-register-editorial-board-endorsement/4562162002/
Warren Party-Jump, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Elizabeth_Warren
S-1039, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1039/cosponsors?q={%22search%22:[%22s+1039%22]}&r=1&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false
Trench photo from "1917," https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8579674/
..



IMMEDIATE RELEASE///ATTN@CDR VIA-TACNET///W/RF2JCL//AMBUSH//UNCLASSIFIED--


GROUNDHOGDAY & #IOWACAUCUS--

Punxsutawney Phil's Campaign Predictions--EXCLUSIVE LEAKED REPORT    23 January 2020

This Just In ( 01.25.20/1630PST):   DM Register Endorses Warren:

#IOWACAUCUS---The Des Moines Register Endorsement---AFTERBATH & SHELL SHOCK

IMMEDIATE RELEASE///@CD/TACNET VIA JC//AMBUSH//EOC//UNCLASSIFIED "...now an entirely different story about shell-shocked WIAs is hitting the wire..." (The Den @ UNR)--The results are in, the news is out, and the editorial board has decided, here are the highlights of who didn't get the call-- Joe Biden lacks "specific expertise" on income inequality issues and doesn't have a bold enough vision.

     (The Den@UNR)--Countdown has already begun for two important events the first week of February and EOC has just been given the inside scoop on who's not going to see their shadow in Des Moines.  Punxsutawney Phil is expected to announce the official winner(s) of the Iowa Caucus the day before but word has already leaked out from sources close to the event, remaining anonymous for security purposes. The source has also explained the methodology used to arrive at the conclusion.

     Beginning with the most recent poll of the Democratic candidates, the graph at The Des Moines Register places Senator Sanders in the pole position, making a dramatic comeback following a crash and burn back in March of last year, and didn't begin a recovery until September. What precipitated this dramatic fall, as seen in the graph, was probably related to news stories circulating at the time.

     The first week of March, Sanders filed to run as a Democrat and an Independent, as reported by Domenico Montanaro  at NPR;
     "The new DNC rules state that a candidate must 'be a bona fide Democrat whose record of public service, accomplishment, public writings, and/or public statements affirmatively demonstrates that the candidate is faithful to the interests, welfare, and success of the Democratic Party of the United States'." (NPR)

     Bernie found himself in trouble over that very issue during his most recent re-election to Congress for Vermont. In 2018, for the US Senate, he took 94 percent of the vote against Folasade Adeluola, who claimed Bernie party-jumped to retain his seat, Jack Thurston reported for NBC Boston;
     "NBC 10 Boston and necn (sp?) obtained the formal complaint Adeluola filed this week with the Vermont Secretary of State’s office, in which she alleges Sanders is trying to 'game' the system—claiming his 'pattern of infidelity' to the Vermont Democratic Party has corrupted the process." (NBC)
    A month later, an article published in Forbes  by reporter Chase Peterson-Withorn reflected the so-called "Socialist Senator's" finances, certainly not one as to what would be expected;
     "Sanders, 77, has, in fact, amassed an estimated $2.5 million fortune from real estate, investments, government pensions—and earnings from three books, including the 2016 hit Our Revolution: A Future to Believe In. 'I wrote a best-selling book. If you write a best-selling book, you can be a millionaire, too.' " (Forbes)
     Marx would be furious to hear how the Senator exploited the capitalist system while professing himself a champion of the underdog (or is that underhog?). Either way, such nuances in his character certainly could not have helped his campaign a great deal and throughout the summer, it struggled with Iowans.
     Politico had all but given Bernie up for the man in the shadows by September but he did something nobody expected, he did what George McGovern did in '72, he made Iowa a priority;
     "(WEST LIBERTY, Iowa) — Bernie Sanders was on the final leg of a barnstorming tour through Iowa last week that he hoped would persuade voters he’s the best candidate to take on President Donald Trump. He had crisscrossed the state at typical breakneck speed, visiting, in two days, five counties that had thrown their lot in with Trump after helping put Barack Obama in the White House." (Politico)
      It worked, his graph went north while everyone else's went south. He currently leads in Iowa and as the Groundhog would predict, he will win the caucus. Although Liz Warren spiked about the time Bernie had his heart attack, it became hers to lose and she did. The senior citizens in the race have vowed to release their medical records to show they are fit to be President, but that was back in September and there is no indication it has happened. As age became an issue, so did gender with criticism falling on whether a woman could make the grade as CEO of the USA. Most of that is already old news. Kit Norton reported in VT Digger of some other seemingly inconsequential news events regarding the Sanders effort that went unnoticed, at least until he became the frontrunner in Iowa. (VT Digger)

    But Bernie's real boost came, according to Punxsutawney Phil, when the White House announced that Senator Sanders was the front runner in Iowa, as reported by Kristen Fisher and Alex Pappas in Fox News;
     "President Trump’s re-election campaign is deeming Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders the indisputable frontrunner in the Democratic primary, as polling shows the Democratic socialist rising in Iowa just weeks before the caucuses kick off the nominating season.
'There is no mistaking that Bernie Sanders has to be considered the frontrunner now,' a senior Trump campaign official told Fox News on Monday." (Fox News)
     Although it is unclear just who the official was that made the statement, the spectre of defeat in the minds of the other candidates cannot be hidden in the shadow of Phil as the clock ticks down to Groundhog Day. The polls are bearing it out, the opposition has sanctioned it and now it is up to Punxsutawney Phil to formally announce it.
     What's in store for the losers? Nothing more than to be endlessly living the same day over and over again until they finally get it right.

Further Reading

AOC and Michael Moore urge Iowa voters not to 'play it safe' as they stand in for Sanders

Two of Bernie Sanders's highest-profile allies, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and liberal documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, filled in for him on the campaign trail Friday night, speaking to a rally here at the University of Iowa, as the Vermont senator participated in the impeachment trial

#IOWACAUCUS---NY Times Endorsements-- AGE-GENDER DOUBLE STANDARD

IMMEDIATE RELEASE///ATTN CD@TACNET FWD//CMD//BVIA JCL//UNCLASSIFIED Suddenly, it's all for a woman to be Commander-in-Chieftess, and Ms. POTUS. (The Den)--Only one time since the turn of the last century and its endorsement of William McKinley in 1900 has The New York Times endorsed a woman for president, and that was Hillary Clinton in 2016.


Sources
Wiki Phil, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punxsutawney_Phil
Des Moines Poll, https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2020/01/12/election-2020-iowa-caucuses-how-candidates-have-performed-iowa-poll/4433074002/
Loyalty Oath, https://www.npr.org/2019/03/04/700121429/bernie-sanders-files-to-run-as-a-democrat-and-an-independent
Party-jumping, https://eyelessoncampus.blogspot.com/2020/01/iowacaucus-ny-times-endorsements-age.html
Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2019/04/12/how-bernie-sanders-the-socialist-senator-amassed-a-25-million-fortune/#2b5697cc36bf
Barnstorming, https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/30/bernie-sanders-2020-election-decline-228755
Other Events, https://vtdigger.org/2019/09/19/bernies-bid-2020-sanders-shakes-up-staff-and-schedule/
Front Runner, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-dubs-bernie-sanders-the-new-dem-frontrunner
Phil Photo, https://visitpago.com/bucket-list-experience-groundhog-day-in-punxsutawney/
Bill Murray Photo, https://variety.com/2018/film/news/groundhog-day-at-25-bill-murray-1202691391/


IMMEDIATE RELEASE///ATTN CD@TACNET FWD//CMD//BVIA JCL//UNCLASSIFIED


IOWACAUCUS---NY Times Endorsements-- AGE-GENDER DOUBLE STANDARD--

20 January 2020

     Suddenly, it's all for a woman to be Commander-in-Chieftess, and Ms. POTUS. 

     (The Den)--Only one time since the turn of the last century and its endorsement of William McKinley in 1900  has The New York Times endorsed a woman for president, and that was Hillary Clinton in 2016. She lost to President Trump. Some of the more predominant endorsements are listed below. Note also that all of them came in late, just a few weeks prior to the general election with Senator Clinton's being the earliest, in September as opposed to the late October endorsements for the others.
      Clearly exploiting the recent flap between candidates Warren and Sanders over the electability of a woman to the Oval Office, the Times editorial board also came under recent criticism from front runner Joe Biden over his age, as reported by Naomi Lim in The Washington Examiner last week;
     "Joe Biden playfully accused The New York Times of pedaling ageism when its editorial board pressed him on whether there was a need for an upper age limit on the presidency.
     'I think you guys are engaging in ageism here,' Biden, 77, told the outlet. 'Now, look: All kidding aside, I don’t think they’re — the voters — will be able to make a judgment. You’ll make a judgment whether or not you think I have all my cognitive capability, I’m physically capable, and I have the energy to do the job. ' " (Washington Examiner)

     With respect to the Times Board of Directors, of the twelve, only three are women, most if not all are younger than VP Biden. Overlooked in the age-gender flap is timing of the endorsements. Not just for the sake of taking a stand on the gender issue in the race is one of early caucuses and primaries, the Times hoping to influence them sooner, rather than later. The endorsements of Warren and Klobuchar are designed to influence votes even before the conventions that usually come in late summer. The first, the Iowa caucus, is just around the corner where polls show the oddball Bernie Sanders in the lead and a recent announcement by Team Trump that Bernie is the man to beat in Des Moines. Emily Larsen reports for The Washington Examiner as to the decision by the Times editorial board;
     "...the New York Times editorial board announced that it could not decide between two choices for Democratic presidential nominee, one on the left, the other a centrist." (Examiner)

     The Times also makes a grandstand statement about "may the best woman win," if that is the case, why did the newspaper endorse Obama over Hillary Clinton in 2008? (Wikipedia) Two theories could account for this, one is genderism versus ethnicity, the other is expediency, neither offers a quality explanation. In fact, the 2008 race had but just one female contender, Senator Clinton. President Obama went unopposed in the next election. The 2020 campaign is in reality the first major test of the opportunity for a woman to become president, whether Bernie agrees with it or not. One ironic twist to all of this was that Sarah Palin ran on the McCain ticket in '08, when the Times editorial board had an opportunity to cheer a woman for the executive branch, but passed. Suddenly, it's all for a woman to be Commander-in-Chieftess, and Ms. POTUS.
     If the local paper is any indication of just how insignificant the NY Times endorsement is, The Des Moines Register on its page related to candidate backing, makes no mention of it. However, Senator Warren did get the go ahead from the Storm Lake Times on December 11th. (DM Register)

     In the ever shifting world of presidential candidate politics, just how far the runners can play the age-gender cards has yet to be seen. Is Joe Biden correct, that at his age, he can still do more pushups than the overweight heckler at a recent rally? Is Bernie spot on when he says Warren is just not qualified because she's the wrong sex? Joan Summers on Jezebel thinks Joe is good for at least 25 pushups. (Jezebel) Bernie has had female opponents in the past in his home state of Vermont, in his bids for mayor, governor and the senate.
     In 1986, according to his electoral history at Wikipedia, Bernie was crushed by Madeleine M. Kunin when he ran on the Independent ticket; he did win in '83 and '85 for the Burlington mayor's job against women. In 2018, for the US Senate, he took 94 percent of the vote against Folasade Adeluola, who claimed Bernie party-jumped to retain his seat, Jack Thurston reported for NBC Boston;
     "NBC 10 Boston and necn (sp?) obtained the formal complaint Adeluola filed this week with the Vermont Secretary of State’s office, in which she alleges Sanders is trying to 'game' the system—claiming his 'pattern of infidelity' to the Vermont Democratic Party has corrupted the process." (NBC)
     Obviously confident after crushing his most recent female opponent, Bernie might have certainly extrapolated the conclusion that women simply do not belong in the White House, especially running in the same campaign against him, but that isn't the issue.
     It's OK for the media to decide what is age-worthy and gender-worthy for a candidate, but not for the candidate to decide. Combine that with the Times' early, more like still-born, thumbs up votes for two women candidates, prior to the first signs of Bernie pulling ahead in Des Moines, motive enters and appears to be:
    The Times has that same uneasy feeling about Bernie that Team Trump has; he's a threat, shades of McGovern, using Nixonesque strategy to undermine his campaign even before it starts. But as in the anti-endorsement last week when Team Trump acknowledged Bernie as the front runner in Iowa, the Times now finds it has only made his position stronger by placing legitimacy on the enemy before the first battle has even been fought.

Further Reading:

Register editorial board to announce caucus endorsement at 6 p.m. Saturday

Before the announcement, here's a quick explanation of who's doing the endorsing and why it's being done. The Des Moines Register's editorial board will announce its endorsement for Iowa's Democratic Party presidential caucuses at 6 p.m. Saturday, Jan. 25. The caucuses, the first presidential nominating contest in the nation ahead of November's general election, are Feb.

Amid sexism spat, Sanders says his age and Warren's gender are both problems

MANCHESTER, New Hampshire - Bernie Sanders made a comparison Sunday between the challenges women face in politics today and his running for president at the age of 78 as the Democratic presidential candidate continues to face questions over his recent feud with Elizabeth Warren on sexism in politics.


NY Times Endorsements in recent campaigns,

George McGovern, Oct 22, 1972
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/mcgovern-1972.pdf
Walter Mondale, Oct 28, 1984
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/1984-mondale.pdf
Michael Dukakis (D-  )   Oct 30, 1988
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/dukakis-1988.pdf
Bill Clinton,  Oct 25, 1992
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/1992-clinton.pdf
Al Gore,   Oct 29, 2000
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/2000-gore.pdf
John Kerry,   Oct 17, 2004
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/kerry-2004.pdf
Barack Obama,  Oct 23, 2008
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/24/opinion/24fri1.html
Hillary Clinton,  Sept 24, 2016
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html
Complete List
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/23/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html


Sources
Ageism, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-chides-new-york-times-for-coverage-of-older-candidates-i-bike-treadmill-and-i-lift
NYT Directors, https://www.nytco.com/board-of-directors/
Examiner, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/new-york-times-endorses-warren-and-klobuchar-in-democratic-primary
2008 campaign, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_United_States_presidential_election
DM Register, https://www.desmoinesregister.com/search/warren%20endorsement/
Jezebel, https://theslot.jezebel.com/how-many-push-ups-do-we-think-joe-biden-can-do-1840249718
Pushups, https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/12xwqq/joe_biden_doing_pushups_with_little_girls/
Party jump, https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/defeated-opponent-folasade-adeluola-claims-bernie-sanders-games-vt-primaries/137581/
Iowa caucus image, https://www.kcrg.com/content/news/Iowa-Democrats-deploying-early-check-in-option-for-2020-caucus-566284311.html


EXCLUSIVE TO @EOC///ATTN//JCL//UNR//14J2020//RUSH DELIVERY..

IOWACAUCUSES--Bernie and the McGovern Parallel--AN OPERATIONAL POTENTIAL PARADIGM  13 January 2020


"..Well, there are caucuses in Iowa, but nobody pays attention to them....."  Gary Hart for Team McGovern, 1972


      (The Den)---Closely resembling a pattern from the 1972 election, candidate Bernie Sanders rises to the occasion, similar to that followed by George McGovern. Issue driven with war and palace intrigue on the debate platform, the opposition, Team Trump, just announced Bernie as the newly designated Twitter target, reported by Kristin Fisher and Alex Pappas at Fox news;
     "President Trump’s re-election campaign is deeming Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders the indisputable frontrunner in the Democratic primary, as polling shows the Democratic socialist rising in Iowa just weeks before the caucuses kick off the nominating season." (Fox)

Trump campaign dubs Bernie Sanders the new Dem 'frontrunner'

President Trump's re-election campaign is deeming Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders the indisputable frontrunner in the Democratic primary, as polling shows the Democratic socialist rising in Iowa just weeks before the caucuses kick off the nominating season. "There is no mistaking that Bernie Sanders has to be considered the frontrunner now," a senior Trump campaign official told Fox News on Monday.
     What better endorsement can a candidate get than being promoted in the field by the enemy without having even fought a battle?  It also tells a great deal about Team Trump and its intel reports, it appears the President is determined to stay in office in spite of all of his current troubles. The inside report comes over Bernie's Iran posture;
     "It just so happened that for a long time Joe Biden was a gaffe a minute and we focused a lot on him. But this whole episode with Iran revealed just how dangerous [Sanders] would be if he were somehow to become president.”
     That process of "somehow" becoming president is known as a free election. Why the comparison to the 1972 affair with George McGovern?  It has to do with the Iowa Caucuses and how it became the launchpad  Joshua Mound has it right in the New Republic;
     "For the past 40 years, whenever a Democratic presidential hopeful has given off the slightest whiff of leftish anti-establishmentarianism, party leaders and mainstream pundits have invoked McGovern’s name. In 2004, Howard Dean was the new McGovern. In 2008, Barack Obama became the new McGovern. This year, it’s Bernie Sanders’s turn." (New Republic)

What Democrats Still Don't Get About McGovern

Anthony Korody/Getty Images The party took all the wrong lessons from his landslide loss to Richard Nixon in '72. A specter is haunting the Democratic Party-"McGovernism." In 1972, President Richard Nixon shellacked his Democratic opponent, George McGovern, by a 23-point margin in the popular vote.

     Mound appears to attribute the Goldwater loss to Goldwater himself and forgetting he ran against LBJ, but the comparison was made with reference to the Nixon-McGovern landslide for the Republicans. That was because, as Mound correctly suggests, the Nixon camp astutely recognized the operational potential of the McGovern camp;
     "To the surprise of nearly everyone outside of the McGovern campaign itself, the strategy worked. In confidential memos, the Nixon reelection campaign called the George Wallace and McGovern efforts 'the only two smart campaigns.' McGovern, in particular, worried Nixon’s advisers because his 'class appeal' was 'pinning the adjective ‘rich’ to Republicans.' McGovern had been 'badly underestimated' and was 'potentially very dangerous to the President,' the Nixon analysis concluded."
     That strategy was, of course, appealing to the Average Joe in America. So it wasn't necessarily that McGovern had this great charisma, like JFK, but that his machine was well oiled, experienced, and veterans of prior failed campaigns. Then George did what Bernie said he isn't going to do, make a "white guy" his running mate, and certainly not an old one at that;
     "Sanders called choosing someone to round out his hypothetical ticket 'a little bit premature,' but he did say the person 'will not be an old white guy.' The 78-year-old Sanders said he believes in diversity and promised his cabinet 'will look like what America looks like,' adding that 'the country is long overdue for the kind of diversity that we're going to bring to the White House.' " (The Week)
     It doesn't matter that McGovern placed second in the '72 Iowa caucus, it mattered that he placed second. Pundits will argue that it was Carter in '76 that "revolutionized" the caucus, but as Robert Sam Anson reflects in Vanity Fair, it was the McGovern team that set the standard;
     “ 'How ’bout asking for money in this thing?'  He said, 'Well, I don’t know about that.' Long story short, I convinced him to let me put some requests for money in, and with a New York ad man named Tom Collins, I came up with the kind of letter I knew would sell anything. It was seven pages, probably the longest letter in direct-mail history." (Vanity Fair)

     That was Morris Dees who became part of the McGovern machine along with Gary Hart and Rick Stearns. The mailer raised $300K in 10 days. It was Hart who suggested Iowa and the team moved there to take on Ed Muskie. Point man was Doug Coulter, a Special Forces recon man out of the war;
     "We didn’t take donations, took stamps for mailings, lived out of petty cash, and slept on people’s floors."
     Although Andrew Busch skips ove the Iowa caucus in his book Outsiders and Openness in the Presidential Nominating System, he does make one important point about the method to the McGovern madness;
     "In students, in housewives, so much of their time is their own, the Movement seemed to have developed the manpower equivalent of the old patronage rolls of machine politics. The new political leisure class could man telephones or hit the doorsteps with bodies and skills that overwhelmed bot the numbers and the quality of their competitors within the old party" (Outsiders)
     Forty-eight years later, another long-shot with Jimmy "The Greek" Snyder's odds probably in line with that of McGovern's, is set to engage the big-money candidates in Des Moines.  The similarities are striking even if the Democrats themselves are clueless.
     (Article in continuous development)

Further Reading:

What's on Iowans' minds as Democratic presidential candidates head into Tuesday's debate?

CLOSE Iowans, with unmatched access to presidential candidates, have a few things on their minds. Caucusgoers in the first-in-the-nation state have been thinking about presidential candidates' stances on three key issues: Health care, climate change and education, according to extensive Des Moines Register reporting and data from Iowa Polls of likely Democratic caucusgoers.
What's missing here" Possibly the immense pressure Iowa farmers faced only last year when the administration slapped tariffs on China, all but destroying the markets for agricultural crops throughout the state.  That was before the weather hit. Health care, climate change? Des Moines Register)_

Sources
Fox, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-dubs-bernie-sanders-the-new-dem-frontrunner
New Republic, https://newrepublic.com/article/130737/democrats-still-dont-get-george-mcgovern
The Week, https://theweek.com/speedreads/889087/bernie-sanders-says-potential-running-mate-not-old-white-guy
Vanity Fair, https://www.vanityfair.com/news/politics/2012/11/george-mcgovern-richard-nixon-election
McGovern Button,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_McGovern_1972_presidential_campaign#/media/File:McGovern_'72_button_(1).jpg
Iowa Poster, http://ourgrinnell.com/?p=13273
Busch., A., Outsiders and Openness, Pittsburgh Press, 1997, Page 87 (footnote 29)
Issues, https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/agriculture/2019/05/10/us-china-trade-war-iowa-farmers-take-hit-tariffs-increase/1143730001/

EXCLUSIVE TO @EOC///ATTN//JCL//UNR//14J2020//RUSH DELIVERY..


BROWNSHIRT BERNIE BACK FROM THE DEAD  19 February 2019

His MAGA hat will be brown not red
Brownshirt Bernie back from the dead..

You would think that old man has better things to do,
Than squeeze a vote out of me and you.
Another candidate who is older than dirt
On the campaign trail in his Brownshirt.

Bottom line of the Brownshirt pitch
Is take all the money away from the rich.
Turn the country into a welfare state
That's how he plans to Make America Great.

Bernie Sanders, the dinosaur,
Throwback hero of the poor.
The old fogie has big plans for us
The beady-eyed old Lazarus.

Just another old man down the road
With a campaign that's sure to implode.
Bernie's the real national emergency
An embarrassment to the DNC.

Who knows, he might get the nomination,
Elected as a fossilized crustacean.
His MAGA hat will be brown not red
Brownshirt Bernie back from the dead..

Brownshirt Bernie Back From the Dead
by James C. L'Angelle
(C) 2019 Eyeless on Campus







..

BOB KAUFMAN--Origin of "Beatnik"--CONTINUED--


14 November 2016--


Following article found in the Asheville Citizen Times  -- Sept 05, 2000




Book Exposes Neglected Poets, by Melissa Williams--

"But if there's one reason to pick up the issue, it may well be with the inventor of the word "beatnik," Bob Kaufman, a half-black, half-Jewish jazz lover..."

EOC400.3001--The Internet as an Existential Invasive Species--A QUANTUM LEAP INTO THE 22ND CENTURY


19 July 2019

EOC400.3001
J. L'Angelle
Univ of Nevada, Reno
Fall 2019




     This week America has witnessed divisions over politics, race, nationality, gender, and equality not seen since the years prior to the outbreak of World War Two and the culprit behind it all? Politicians? Possibly but  deeper into the hatred is what fuels it, the Internet. Parallels to the leadup to the Second World War are many most of which revolve around race and nationality. To make a blanket statement that race itself was the root cause of the war may or may not be an oversimplification, but it certainly, from today's perspective, might be given some credence.  That's not the issue, the issue is the greatest threat to human to come out of the last century, the Internet.




     Its value cannot be overstressed, it has connected the globe in countless ways, but it has also been subverted for use by demagogues and no more obvious than the chain of events leading up to the recent Congressional resolution aimed directly at the President in his shameful attacks on new liberal Congresswomen. However, there is something else that needs to be pointed out, the recent report by a rather dubious internet entity known as "Propublica." It's so-called expose of a Facebook group tagged "secret," although there is no direct evidence there are secret groups on the social media platform other than groups requiring permission to join, is a case in point.
     There were hearings on Wednesday where an exchange between  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Homeland Security rep Kevin McAleenan regarding the group involved certain disgusting posts were discussed;


     " 'Did you see the posts planning physical harm to myself and Congresswoman Escobar?' Ocasio-'Cortez asked McAleenan. 'Yes,' he answered. 'And I directed an investigation within reading the article.' 'Did you see the images of officers circulating photoshop images of my violent rape?' Ocasio-Cortez continued. 'Yes I did,' McAleenan responded. " (Christal Hayes, USA Today)
The fact that the Propublica article at the center of the investigation has yet to be verified just isn't that important if it can be used to further the agenda of the internet as an existential invasive species, since truth is not relevant. (EOC)
     At the heart of just such a divisive issue is not the veracity of the article, but the ignorance of those who take the article at face value without waiting for verification, using it for political cannon fodder wherever it suits an agenda. That's what the internet, and social media in particular has become. Duped by this existentially destructive tool, the human race finds itself no longer in the 21st century, but thrust into the next, through its own ignorance of culture, a lack of regard for history, a disingenuous concern for others, and a superficial understanding of how the human race overall has become obsolete. Taking credit for this irreversible course of self-destruction is the misuse of a simple online platform, social media.
     At every turn of the hashtag ignorance surfaces; of lessons learned in higher education  just as quickly forgotten or ignored, of prejudicial booby traps in every tweet and countertweet, defensive and hostile in nature and targeting the equally ignorant. Civilization has been doomed by its own rapid advance into a universe, a cyberspace full of tunnel-vision and selfish disregard for its own intellectual advance in the face of ignorance.
     The bottom line may well be nothing more complicated than advertising, if the lie sells ads quicker than the truth, print the lie. If the lie can be splashed across the globe with the newest invasive species, the internet, then flood the world with unsubstantiated lies. Social media guarantees the survival of the internet beyond the obsolete 21st century, and mankind itself for that matter.


Works Cited
Hayes, C., https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/18/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-homeland-security-kevin-mcaleenan-facebook-group/1769460001/
EOC,JOUR304.2001--Final Papers: "The Dedicated and the Dilettante"--UNIV OF NEVADA, RENO, SUMMER 2019,  https://eyelessoncampus.blogspot.com/2019/07/jour3042001-final-papers-dedicated-and.html


EOC400.3002--Existential Symbiosis: Dilettantes & Demagogues-- SOCIAL MEDIA AS PANDEMIC INVASIVE SPECIES


21 July 2019

EOC400.3002
J L'Angelle
Univ of Nevada, Reno
Fall 2019



     Mutualism,  commensalism and parasitism equally define three various types of interactions between organisms related to the term symbiosis. (Britannica) Each, in relation to the invasive species  known as "social media" takes on a peculiar form. Diametrically opposed in nature, the social media symbiotes survive existentially due to the very nature of their radical differentiation. Two distinct forms that exist co-dependently on the invasive species internet platform known as "social media" are the "Dilettante" and the "Demagogue." The first is usually a non-credentialed journalist, typically a blogger, troller, muckraker or similar who often can even represent a semi-credible online news organization. The second more often than not takes the form of the politician.
         The “Dilettante” style of reporting has become very acceptable on Twitter, with some of the non-credentialled so-called, self-styled “journalists” not required to show their papers. Take, for instance, the recent story concerning a “secret” Facebook group allegedly with members from the Customs and Border and Protection (CBP) agency of the Department of Homeland Security. The group called itself the “I’m 10-15” and the story first appeared in ProPublica in an article by AC Thompson;


     “ProPublica received images of several recent discussions in the 10-15 Facebook group and was able to link the participants in those online conversations to apparently legitimate Facebook profiles belonging to Border Patrol agents,” (Thompson, Propublica)
However, when that reporter tried to contact the particular users for verification, he failed. This is standard operating procedure that hints at fake news. It is a byproduct of years of mainstream media’s referencing “anonymous” sources that are taken to be credible, however unacceptable and unscrupulous the practice may be. Thompson’s only real claim to credibility is a brief bio at Wikipedia stating he was on the faculty at New College of California. In fact, that particular institution had its accreditation revoked in 2007 for dubious financial aid dealings. (New College, Wikipedia) This may or may not be an example of one of those so-called mail order "dipscam diploma" colleges.



     Attempting to follow up on the story at The Intercept, yet another reporter with dubious credentials, Ryan Devereux, adds to the unsubstantiated story on July 5, referencing alleged CBP agents by name;
     “Hendricks deleted his account soon after the ProPublica story broke. Garcia and Nunez did not respond to requests for comment.” (Devereux, The Intercept)
Devereux is described at the The Intercept as “award-winning investigative journalist,” with no credentials listed. He has over 25 thousand followers on Twitter. (Twitter)
   Media Bias/Fact Check has this to say about The Intercept;
     “They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.” (Media Bias)
Not only are the reporters at ProPublica and The Intercept lacking in any bona-fide papers, their particular online agencies appear to be under the scrutiny of media watchdogs.
     How does all of this fit into the differential calculus of the "Demagogue?"  Once again, the recent report by a rather dubious internet entity known as "Propublica." It's so-called expose of a Facebook group tagged "secret," although there is no direct evidence there are secret groups on the social media platform other than groups requiring permission to join, is a case in point.
     There were hearings on Wednesday, July 17,  where an exchange between  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Homeland Security rep Kevin McAleenan regarding the group involved certain disgusting posts were discussed;



      " 'Did you see the posts planning physical harm to myself and Congresswoman Escobar?' Ocasio-'Cortez asked McAleenan. 'Yes,' he answered. 'And I directed an investigation within reading the article.' 'Did you see the images of officers circulating photoshop images of my violent rape?' Ocasio-Cortez continued. 'Yes I did,' McAleenan responded. " (Christal Hayes, USA Today)
The fact that the Propublica article at the center of the investigation has yet to be verified just isn't that important if it can be used to further the agenda of the demagogue using the internet as an existential invasive species, since truth is not relevant. (EOC) At the heart of just such a divisive issue is not the veracity of the article, but the ignorance of those who take the article at face value without waiting for verification, using it for political cannon fodder wherever it suits an agenda.
     So long as there are sources on the invasive species platform known as social media that do not require verification, written by hacks, frauds, the non-credentialed Dilettantes, their symbiotic counterparts, the Demagogues, using any means necessary to justify their agendas whether legitimate or self-serving, have fertile ground to procreate in this pervasive environment. Thus is the nature of the internet as an existential invasive species that has come into being from the 20th century and has expanded at a rate that, if this were atomic physics, might even be considered a critical mass. In biological terms, it might be more appropriate to apply one of its popular terms, "viral," in other words, "pandemic," a worldwide spread of a new disease.

Works Cited
Symbiosis, https://www.britannica.com/science/symbiosis
“I’m 10-15”, https://www.propublica.org/article/secret-border-patrol-facebook-group-agents-joke-about-migrant-deaths-post-sexist-memes
New College, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_College_of_California#Revocation_of_accreditation_and_financial_collapse
Devereux, R., https://theintercept.com/2019/07/05/border-patrol-facebook-group/
Devereux-Twitter, https://twitter.com/rdevro
The Intercept, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/
Hayes, C., https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/18/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-homeland-security-kevin-mcaleenan-facebook-group/1769460001/

EOC400.3007--"Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood"---EXPLOITING TRAGEDY & IRRELEVANCE

28 July 2019

EOC400.3007
J L'Angelle
Univ of Nevada, Reno
Fall 2019



     (SoHo Stn)-- Bygone days of Hollywood are always overdone and this one is no exception. It isn't enough to take an ensemble cast and show the public just how irrelevant they are in the 21st century scheme of things, but to have them portray characters who are just as irrelevant adds to the theory there is nothing new in "Once Upon a Time..." Hopefully, the reviews posted leading up to and including the release of the film will give insight of the content, but don't count on it.
     In the New Yorker, Richard Brody titles the film "Obscenely Regressive," and from the review, he points out the obvious white boy appeal of the DiCaprio-Pitt bromance in a putdown where reference isn't to "Latinos" but "Mexicans,"
     "and that features a slur against Mexicans, “beaner.” (At another moment, early in the film, in a parking lot, when Rick recognizes that his career is in decline, he begins to shed tears, and Cliff lends him a pair of sunglasses: “Don’t let the Mexicans see you crying.”) (Brody, New Yorker)
Brody also mentions the so-called "LSD laced cigarette," as if either DiCaprio or Pitt have any experience with the hallucinogenic drug in real life or on screen, or Tarantino for that matter.
     "Hippies" appear to be those related to the Manson cult with no cultural reference other than that related to the murderous ensemble. The director, Tarantino, was 6 years old in 1969, (IMDB) the "end of an era," when in fact, the era was dictated by the war and not by some sadistic multiple murder in southern California.
     Further radical criticism of the Tarantino white male hulking honcho style is characterized in National Review today by Kyle Smith;
     "scene depicting violence against a woman that goes on a bit too long. And when I say “a bit too long” I mean it’s grotesque. The point is made long before the shot ends. There’s also a running joke about how the Brad Pitt character killed his wife and got away with it. Tarantino finds this detail hilarious; I don’t see the humor. " (Smith, Nat Review)
Considering the nature of the film material, it is a wonder anything at all in the film is humorous.
     Owen Gleiberman's review in Variety offers little insight into the mindset of the director with his subverted plot failure following two full hours of soporific reminiscing of how things were at the end of the Sixties;
     "don’t go to Roman Polanski’s house. Instead, they go to the house next door, where Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio), the fading TV star who’s the hero of “Once Upon a Time…,” is hanging out with his stuntman and driver, Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt). And what unfurls, from that moment, is a splatterific climax of gruesomely over-the-top violence in which the Manson killers get slaughtered by Rick and (mostly) by Cliff." (Variety)
What was Tarantino smoking when he came up with this absolutely absurd finale that's being written off by critics as a "plot twist?" In a world full of fake news, this is what we might expect from Roger Corman or Bert I. Gordon.
     Somewhere in the film and in the critics, the mention of spaghetti westerns appears, and this is what the film is, nothing short of Clint Eastwood along with those other two who could pass for either bad or ugly, or both. "Once Upon a Time..." is not just a cult fiction nightmare, but just plain nightmare, ushering in yet another era for Hollywood filmmakers; where bigotry and women hating finds equal footing with effacing history, replacing truth, that of the bad, ugly truth of the Manson gang, to represent the "beautiful people" of the Sixties and what it was really like to be high on acid.
     Tarantino and his butt buddies in the cast missed out on all of it because they weren't even teenagers at the time, DiCaprio wasn't even born and Pacino should have known better.

Late Entry:
Yet one more example of the superior white attitude portrayed in the film brought out by the late Bruce Lee's daughter;
     "Shannon Lee saw the film Sunday. 'It was really uncomfortable to sit in the theater and listen to people laugh at my father,' she said.
She said that her father was often challenged, and tried to avoid fights. 'Here, he's the one with all the puffery and he's the one challenging Brad Pitt. Which is not how he was,' she said." (The Wrap)


     (Update-08/01/19)--Further details on the stereotyping of martial arts legend Bruce Lee by white boy Tarantino & Co. in today's Audrey Cleo Yap article in the Variety;
“Bruce Lee would have never said anything derogatory about Muhammad Ali because he worshiped the ground Muhammad Ali walked on. In fact, he was into boxing more so than martial arts,” says Inosanto, one of only three martial artists who were trained by Lee to teach Jeet Kune Do at Lee’s martial arts institutes. (Yap, Variety)
It appears the effort was made not just to trash M<aster Lee but The Greatest as well. The article is overall a complete and total rejection of the small-minded Tarantino directorship style in the film, which of couse, has been getting high marks by the white status quo of the industry.


Works Cited
Brody, R, https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-front-row/review-quentin-tarantinos-obscenely-regressive-vision-of-the-sixties-in-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood
Tarantino, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/
Smith, K., Cancelled, https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/quentin-tarantino-is-cancelled/
Gleiberman, O., https://variety.com/2019/film/columns/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-lets-talk-about-that-ending-column-1203282027/
Molly, T., Shannon Lee,  https://www.thewrap.com/bruce-lee-daughter-mockery-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-shannon-lee/
Yap, AC., https://variety.com/2019/film/features/bruce-lee-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-dan-inosanto-1203287237/

ENG298.1002-- "There There" (2018) by Tommy Orange --"NO SAFE ZONE," AN ESSAY PROPOSAL

ENG298.1002
James L’Angelle
University of Nevada, Reno
Dr. A. Keniston
29 October 2019

“There There” Is No Safe Zone



     Unreliable as some of the narration may be throughout the novel, Tommy Orange does bring
a certain amount of realism and accuracy to the story. The many styles of narration confuses and
leaves the reader off balance because the point of view and tense is constantly shifting like the
ground above the Loma Prieta fault. Where does the reader find a safe zone, where does he find
refuge when the Big One hits in the text?
     Certainly one would expect the climax to come somewhere near the end of the story, which in fact, it does with the gun battle at the Coliseum powwow. But throughout the story, mini-plots emerge that are later addressed by the characters involved as they gradually all converge on the festivities and become victims of a plot hatched early on, hinted at in various episodes, by the
author. Where exactly to draw the line on becoming a “victim” is unclear since the characters are victims in one way or another all through the story. This is where truth from fiction becomes a
useful tool to find out who really suffers and who is just a figment of imagination, appearing in
the story to justify it. This is where separating the reliable from the unreliable narrator defines
that very truth.
     By the process of elimination, it becomes evident who the unreliable narrator is. When Dene Oxendene is talking to his dying uncle Lucas, the latter describes a film he is thinking about;

“It’s gonna end in a reverse Kubrick 2001 human-bashing-a-bone sequence in slow motion.
Have you seen 2001 ?”
“No,” Dene said.
“ Full Metal Jacket ?”
“No?” ( There There , page 31)

Regardless of how and why the film ends with respect to what really happened, it seems
completely out of character that Dene has not seen one of the most celebrated science fiction
films ever made by a legendary director. ( 2001: A Space Odyssey )
     In yet another segment of that same episode titled “Dene Oxendene,” the budding young
documentary filmmaker arrives at his grant hearing completely unprepared and totally clueless of the people who sit on the committee, describing them by their external ethnic appearance without the slightest regard for their qualifications. (page 39) Although Dene gives a promising pitch for
his project, he walks away still doubtful the results will be positive. This is but one example of
where the character seems out of place, contrived in an unreliable narrative fashion in order to
add substance to the novel. Hiding in the fluff, however, are true characters.
     Alcatraz becomes the setting in a backflash that involves the 1970 Native American
occupation of the former federal prison. A family uproots itself from its Oakland residence and
joins the protest in the episode titled “Opal Viola Victoria Bear Shield,” narrated in the
first-person and the past tense. It involves Opal, her sister Jacquie and their Mom as they find
themselves in the company of some unsavory characters who have other ideas about the takeover
of the facility.
     In the episode, Opal has a conversation with her teddy bear, Two Shoes, even though it’s
plainly evident that teddy bears don’t talk;

     “Creator made me strong to protect you,” Two Shoes said.
     I told Two Shoes to stop talking like an Indian.
     “I don’t know what you mean by talking like an Indian,” he said.
     “You’re not an Indian, you’re a teddy bear.” (page 51)

There is something intrinsically convincing about this particular exchange, referred to in
linguistics as an “adjacency pair.” (SLT Info) Because it has a formal definition, in spite of its
unrealistic possibility, it becomes a reliable component of the character, Opal.
     Later on, when the family returns to Oakland, Opal discovers her sister is pregnant due to an assault by one of the unsavory characters on the island;

     “It doesn’t matter, I can just get rid of it.”
     “No, you cannot just get rid of--”
     “I know someone, my friend Adriana’s brother knows someone in West Oakland.”
     “Jacquie, you can’t--” (page 60)

To convince the reader of the reliability of the narrator, the episode concludes with a further
interchange;

     “It’s not a story, Opal, this is real.”
     “It could be both.”
     “Life doesn’t work out the way stories do.” (page 60)

The comparison of truth to fiction is evident and that separates the reliable from the unreliable
narrator. It also separates the real victim from the contrived victim.



     Standing on shaky ground page after page in There There , the narrator cannot find that safe
zone as he is constantly off balance in the first-person past-tense, the third-person present-tense
and at least one second-person, rapper style narration. Between the faults of the story, however,
there is a definite place of refuge so that when the Big One does hit, vis-à-vis a reliable narrator,
the reader is earthquake ready.




References
Orange, Tommy, There There , 2018, Vintage, NY
2001: A Space Odyssey , (1968) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/
Adjacency Pairs, https://www.sltinfo.com/ca101-adjacency-pairs/
Bay Bridge Photo, https://missionlocal.org/2019/10/it-was-30-years-ago-today-trapped-on-the-bay-bridge-during-the-loma-prieta-quake/
Tommy Orange Photo, https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/books/tommy-orange-wins-john-leonard-prize-for-there-there


ENG298.1002-- "There There" (2018) by Tommy Orange --"NO SAFE ZONE," ESSAY ADDENDUM

ENG298.1002
James L’Angelle
University of Nevada, Reno
Dr. A. Keniston
29 October 2019

“There There” Is No Safe Zone ( Addendum)


     Completely missing his sports heritage, the character “Bill Davis” mentions the success of the
Oakland Athletics “during that magical time for Oakland, 1972 to 1974, when the A’s won three
World Series in a row.” (page 84) What the ex-con Army vet character fails to mention are the
two Oakland Raiders’ Superbowl victories in 1981 against the Philadelphia Eagles and again in
1984 against the Washington Redskins. (Wikipedia)
     What’s fascinating about this rather obvious blunder that qualifies Bill Davis as an unreliable
narrator is the fact that Jim Plunkett, the Raiders’ quarterback, was part Native American, from
his mother’s side;

     “Plunkett was born to New Mexican parents with an Irish-German grandfather on his paternal
side. Plunkett's father was a news vendor afflicted with progressive blindness, who had to
support his blind wife along with their three children. Plunkett's parents were both born in New
Mexico; his mother, whose maiden name was Carmen Blea, was born in Santa Fe and his father,
William Gutierrez Plunkett, was born in Albuquerque. Carmen was also of Native American
ancestry.” (Wikipedia)

     As this is a brief sketch of the MVP quarterback and Wikipedia isn’t the greatest source for
information, still it exposes yet another major fault line in the story, making Bill Davis another
important unreliable narrator.

References,
There There , Tommy Orange, 2018, Vintage, NY
Jim Plunkett, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Plunkett
Jim Plunkett Photo, https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5-for-friday-jim-plunkett-raiders-super-bowl-quarterback-081514

ENG298.1002--A Paradox: Mr. Wopsle in Victorian England Theater---UNIV OF NEVADA, RENO, FALL 2019

ENG298.1002
James L’Angelle
University of Nevada, Reno
Dr. A. Keniston
21 November 2019

 A Paradox: Mr. Wopsle in Victorian England Theater

     Charles Dickens creates a character in his novel Great Expectations who initially is an obscure clerk in a village parish church but moves on to London where he performs in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Mr. Wopsle, through the narrative first-person view of Pip Pirrip, is a bumbling B-rated actor going by the name “Roscius” as well as “Waldengarver.” Wopsle, along with just about everybody else in the play, is humiliated by the “Debating Society” in the cheap gallery seats, subject to rude remarks and pelted with food.



     Exactly why Dickens bothers to feature Mr. Wopsle at all is a complete mystery. Was it to merely entertain his readers with a unique twist in Great Expectations or is there a deeper significance, perhaps to shed some light on Victorian theater? Twofold then is the objective:
first, the evolution of Mr. Wopsle as a character in Great Expectations; second, a close look at his relation to mid-nineteenth century London theater as personified in presentation of Mr. Wopsle’s Hamlet.
    (Footnote)- “In that respect few subjects offer a tougher challenge than Charles Dickens, with whom the novelist Jane Smiley has been paired. As she acknowledges at the outset of her book, his is ‘possibly the most amply documented literary sensibility in history.’ This is partly because he is arguably second only to Shakespeare in the pantheon of English writers, and so has attracted almost as much critical and scholarly attention.” (David Lodge, The Atlantic)


Sources
Shakespeare, W., Hamlet, 2019, Norton, New York
Dickens, C., Mr. Wopsle’s Hamlet (1861), 2019, Norton, New York, pp 312-14
Lodge, D., Dickens Our Contemporary, 2002, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2002/05/dickens-our-contemporary/302494/
Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Mr_Wopsle_as_Hamlet%2C_by_Harry_Furniss.jpeg

ENG298.1002--Performance Review: “Key Largo,” Geffen Playhouse,--UNIV OF NEVADA, FALL 2019

ENG298.1002
James L’Angelle
University of Nevada, Reno
Dr. A. Keniston
03 December 2019

Performance Review: “Key Largo,” Geffen Playhouse, Westwood, CA, 11/24/2019

     The Story: Haunted by his past, Major Frank McCloud arrives at Hotel Largo with only his duffel bag and no visible means of support. He has come to pay respects to Nora,  the widow of a soldier under his command he deserted during the battle of Cassino, who is living with her blind father-in-law, the owner of the hotel. Little does the Major know, the hotel has been taken over by gangsters led by notorious deportee Johnny Rocco, there to cut a drug deal with his connection driving down from Miami. The inevitable confrontation between the self-declared coward Major McCloud and the ruthless Johnny Rocco reaches its ultimate climax as a hurricane all but destroys the hotel in the meantime.



     The Play: In two acts, from the Maxwell Anderson performance on Broadway in 1939, the plot follows roughly the stage presentation but the characters and era follow the film of the same name, Key Largo. In the original play, the gangsters are swindlers who run a crooked gambling concession and use the hotel as their headquarters. Major “King” McCloud arrives to pay his respects and the widow is actually the daughter of the hotel owner and sister to the deceased soldier. As in the revised motion picture script, the current play at the Geffen Playhouse in Westwood, the Major is named Frank McCloud and the widow is a daughter-in-law. Most of the other characters follow the John Huston directed film while a number of lines are from the original play. There are plot variations with offstage events, such as escaped Seminoles, the Osceola brothers, who are suspected of killing their road gang foreman. In fact, in the play, the swindling gamblers are the culprits but in either case, McCloud uses it as a means of self-sacrifice to atone for his cowardice on the battlefield. The gangster Johnny Rocco, of course, isn’t buying the heroics and eventually challenges the Major to a life-or-death choice, in which McCloud once again turns chicken in the face of death.
     Act One is completely overtaken by the approaching hurricane, and it ends with Johnny Rocco, in the darkened lobby of the hotel, firing shots wildly at the storm with wind blowing, doors flapping and windows crashing. Act Two surrounds the standoff between the Major and Rocco, who has kidnapped Nora as a hostage to make good his escape following the dope deal.  Others in the play have roles ranging from intermediate, such as the blind owner of the hotel, to Rocco’s girlfriend, to his gangster cohorts; to incidental, such as the sheriff in search of the Osceola brothers; and Ziggy, the dope dealer from Miami.
     The Stage: Ornate and classic, the hotel lobby becomes the one and only set for both acts of the play.  With a high ceiling where large oval stained glass windows are pelted constantly with  rain, the lobby itself has a large sofa center stage and other chairs throughout. Downstage right is the bar, where Gaye Dawn, the gangster’s over-the-hill girlfriend drinks heavily and listens to a horse race when McCloud first appears. Right center is a set of stairs leading to the hotel rooms, where Rocco, wearing a red bathrobe, enters in Act One. Stage left are the only two doors into the hotel; the main doors elevated behind a rail and a small door downstage. Upstage center is the check-in counter, where the phone rings several times as Ziggy  reports his whereabouts in the storm. Large fans extend down from the high ceiling and lanterns substitute for lights when the storm knocks out the power at the end of Act One.
     Worth Noting: Some of the richest quotes survived the transition from the original play through the film to the current stage production at the Westwood playhouse.  Johnny Rocco challenges Frank McCloud in a standoff;
     ROCCO  That was your chance to shoot and you didn’t do it. In my game you learn
                     that there are just two kinds of men, those who are not afraid to die and those who
                     are. A man who’s not afraid to die, he’s dangerous. The others you can handle.  
                     (Anderson, 71)
Rocco’s assessment comes from his original counterpart Murillo, in Act One of the Anderson play. It appears later in the Geffen production. Yet another significant line, also spoken by Rocco, reflects the gangster’s rather low opinion of women (note the exact wording is based on Murillo);
     ROCCO  You will have, baby. You will have. It’s the same with women as with nations,
                     baby; the fellow with the most money and the most guns wins. Always.
                     Because that’s what the nations want! And what the women want! (Anderson, 50)
In another scene, Gaye Dawn begs Rocco for a drink and he submits only if she sings for him, in the presence of all the others who are now on the stage. When she finishes and asks for a drink, Rocco says “No! It was the wrong song.”
Another interesting line, in Act Two,  that came nearly directly from the original script was by Sheriff Gash after accepting a $5000 bribe when he discovers “Robert Brown” is actually the notorious Johnny Rocco and Nora suggests he be honest;

     GASH    No, lady, I couldn’t. It’s been tried. You have to have a machine to stay in office,
                    and nothing runs a machine but money. Now I’ve never been off the Keys , but
                    I’ve heard it said there’s honest government elsewhere....There’s a John Chinaman
                    runs the laundry down at Star Key. He says in China the same word that means to
                    govern means to eat. They’ve worked it out in China. The government eats you,
                    but it protects you first, because if it didn’t you wouldn’t get fat enough to make
                    good eating. (Anderson, 105)
        
         
The Cast:
Johnny Rocco, deported mobster; playing the lead role is Andy Garcia.
Gaye Dawn, over-the-hill lounge singer, alcoholic; played by Joely Fisher.
Nora D’Alcala, widow of Victor; played by Rose McIver.
Frank McCloud, the “Major;” played by Danny Pino.
Mr. D’Alcala, the blind hotel owner; played by Tony Plana.
Sheriff Gash, takes a bribe; played by Richard Riehle.
Toots, gangster; played by Stephen Borrello.
Curly, gangster, played by Louis Mustillo.
Ziggy, the Miami connection; played by Bradley Snedeker
Credits:
Director, Doug Hughes
Writers (adapted from original), Jeffrey Hatcher and Andy Garcia
Music, Arturo Sandoval
Scenic Design, John Lee Beatty
Costumes, Linda Cho
Adapted from the original play written by Maxwell Anderson and from the film “Key Largo” (1946), Warner Bros.,  directed by John Huston.

Works Cited
Key Largo, https://www.geffenplayhouse.org/shows/key-largo/
Key Largo (1946), https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040506/
Key Largo, Maxwell Anderson, Anderson House, Washington, D.C., 1939
Image:  http://www.playbill.com/article/see-andy-garcia-joely-fisher-and-danny-pino-in-geffen-playhouses-key-largo

The play has run to a nearly sold out house nightly.

ENG298.1002--Transforming David Mura; from Singularity to Solidarity--UNIV OF NEVADA, RENO, FALL 2019

07 Dec 2019
ENG298.1002
James L'Angelle
University of Nevada, Reno
Dr A. Keniston
Fall 2019

Transforming David Mura; from Singularity to Solidarity

     World War Two erupted globally and abruptly with the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor in December, 1941. As abruptly, in February of 1942, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 requiring Japanese-Americans, loyal or not, to be detained in camps. (1) Poet David Mura's mother was one of the detainees. Although the exact camp location was not mentioned in "An Argument, On 1942," Mura does mention in an interview, the following from another poem "The Colors of Desire;"
                   "....Where is 1944,
                     its snows sweeping down Heart Mountain,
                     to vanish on my mother's black bobbing head,” (2)
    A description of the camp itself somewhat mirrors the elusive description given in Mura's poem;
     "The ‘camp’ consisted of 467 barrack-style buildings sectioned into 20 blocks that served as administration areas and living quarters...A group of military police situated in nine guard towers manned the site and 130 government employees oversaw day-to-day operations." (3)
     Thus, the backdrop for Mura's haunting look into the past suffered by his mother, and others, as they endured life during the war in a remote Wyoming detention facility. Mura speaks in his own voice and that of his mother as the poem progresses, interchanging depending on what needed to be clarified. The voice was singular, describing something in the present that happened far into the past. Three essential components rise from the poem that allow it to be transformed into an entirely new writing: location, time and voice, the result:






Cited Material
1. Exec Order 9066, https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/japanese-american-relocation
2.) The Colors of Desire, https://www.davidmura.com/excerpts.htm
3.) Heart Mountain,